Sphere Project Phase III:  NARRATIVE REPORT # 4

Period: 1 May 2002 – 31 October 2002

 

Summary

 

As noted in the cover letter, all the project objectives are being met. We are deep in the midst of managing and maintaining a three-language secretariat, of conducting a far-reaching handbook revision consultation process, and continuing piloting activities focusing on three countries, rather than globally.

 

Report against proposal objectives:

 

1.           Training programme

Develop a training module placing Sphere within the context of the Code of Conduct. This module would draw on the knowledge and experience of the Red Cross /Red Crescent movement and the NGOs who developed the code. While hundreds of agencies subscribe to the code, many staff are not aware of the extent to which it provides an ethical framework for the Sphere Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards.  This module would contribute to increased understanding of the context provided by some of these core principles that guide humanitarian work. It would also provide case studies that highlight and describe these principles as well as illuminate the dilemmas that may accompany them as they relate to t

1.1       Based on experience and feedback, continue to update and refine the current training modules.  

The four Sphere training modules are complete and available on the Sphere website. The experience of translating the original English versions into French and Spanish was remarkably time-consuming and difficult. The effort was required because of the chronic misunderstandings certain English-language words generate (e.g. accountability, advocacy, etc.).  The experience has allowed us to develop a glossary that will be useful for future project translations including the revised handbook. Hopefully, this effort will assist in an increased global understanding of the formation and of the use of the Sphere project and its handbook.

 

1.2      Conduct a Training of Trainers     

No Training of Trainers (ToT) was conducted during this period but the follow-on activity from previous ToT workshops has been significant. See annex 1 for information on the consequences of our six Training of Trainers.       (NB: A ToT is planned for January 2003.)                                                                             

 

1.3      Facilitate 15 inter-agency workshops worldwide.             

As noted in previous reports, the project has fulfilled this commitment and no interagency workshops took place in the reporting period.                                                 

 

2. Outreach

 

 

 

2.1      Pro-actively engage with the humanitarian community with a particular emphasis on Southern/Eastern situations and voices.

The Jordanian Red Crescent developed an Arabic-language version of the Sphere introductory video and is promoting the Arabic edition of the handbook. Additional Southern/Eastern-based agency engagement is taking place through the handbook revision consultations and pilot work. 

 

2.2      Facilitate incorporation and ratification by UN operational agencies with a focus on co-ordination with implementing partners.

Sphere staff participated in the UNHCR PreExCom and continues to meet bilaterally with UNICEF, OCHA, WHO and WFP. The 2003 workplan of the IASC reference group on Human Rights - Humanitarian Action flags the Sphere revision as an opportunity for the UN/international agencies that are part of the reference group (including OHCHR, UNHCR, UNICEF, ICRC) to submit comments or suggest changes.

 

2.3      Develop generic work plans and support packages adaptable to country-based consortia wishing to create Sphere focal points. See point 3 below.

 

2.4      Review, update and maintain website.

This work continues in three languages, and the website is visited 150,000 times per month from 60 countries.

 

2.5      Produce a 60-minute video based in real-time disaster situations that will graphically illustrate the practical application of the Sphere handbook in field use.

UNHCR, UNICEF, Reuters, Mercy Corps and other international agencies have provided film footage. Interviews have been filmed with key spokespersons and the video is scheduled for launch in May 2003. This film will be available in VHS and DVD for a modest cost through Oxfam Publishing (the handbook distributors).

 

2.6      Prepare, in consultation with the academic community, suggested scenarios for use of handbook in academic curricula, with particular emphasis on universities based in the Southern Hemisphere.

A listing of academic institutions using Sphere will be included in the next interim report.

 

2.7      Continue distribution of the newsletter and other informational material.

The email newsletter distribution list has been refined into three separate lists by language. This allows for targeted mailings and ease of use (before, Spanish and French readers could only access their language versions of the newsletter via the Sphere website).

 

3.  Agency incorporation (the Pilot programme)

After more than two years of piloting the use of the Sphere Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in twenty different organizations worldwide, the project staff and pilot organizations took stock of progress in order to set the direction for the institutionalization of Sphere in the future.

The attached report Institutionalising Sphere, a great start, next steps…aims to represent the experiences and perceptions of key actors in the Sphere process: pilot agencies at headquarter and field levels, the Sphere team and Sphere trainers, and the Management Committee. The findings are based on a series of visits to 102 pilot agency field offices in Central America, East Africa and South Asia conducted in late 2001, together with the views of participants who attended Sphere training workshops over the last two years.

 

In response to the recommendations expressed by the Sphere Pilot agencies in their last meeting (May 2002), the Sphere secretariat is focusing on the work of pilot agencies in three countries rather than globally. The programme is designed to use our resources in order to gather lessons learned and documented case studies on the application of the Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in these countries. The programme supports both institutionalisation and Sphere training in the selected countries. The objective of this focus is to expand our understanding of the application of the Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards by country pilot agencies, through the collection of evidence of its application.

 

This work will include:

-       Documenting detailed experiences of Sphere implementation in disaster response;

-       Documenting detailed experiences of Sphere implementation in disaster preparedness;

-       Participation of Southern agencies in order to:

i) Understand relationships with northern partners and how effective these could be in extending the knowledge and understanding of Sphere

ii) Analysing the experience of working with umbrella and networking bodies in helping to broaden awareness of Sphere at country level.

 

Evidence of Sphere application will be documented and disseminated as widely as possible:

 

·            To encourage mutual learning within and between country pilot agencies

·            To share concrete examples of Sphere implementation which will enhance our understanding of the use of the Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards

·            To provide insights which will assist the Management Committee in planning the responsible closure of the project and envisaging the future.

 

See annex 2 for the Pilot Institutionalisation at Country Level concept paper.

 

 

4. Sphere Handbook Management

 

4.1      Identify, second, and support sector team-leaders for review and revision of handbook in the third year of the project.

The first handbook revision meeting took place in Geneva in June. Over the course of three days, six Focal Points for the Sphere sectors and six Focal Points representing cross-cutting issues met and discussed the feedback gathered to date and next steps. Since that meeting, the Focal Points have held consultations with practitioners around the world. Meetings have been held in Kenya, Ethiopia, USA, UK, Switzerland, Thailand, DRC, Sierra Leone, Vietnam, Turkey, Bosnia, Macedonia, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Angola, Peru, El Salvador, Honduras, and India. Additional meetings are scheduled for Sudan, Somalia, Afghanistan, Philippines, Liberia, Sri Lanka, India, Jordan and other countries in Latin America.

 

The sector Focal Points are organizing their consultations in the following categories:

 

Regional Working Groups:  regional clusters of field practitioners and experts, who have relevant sectoral experience in implementing the minimum standards.  

 

Review Group:  a relatively smaller group of technical staff or advisers based within headquarters or regional offices of the relevant Sphere pilot agencies, international NGOs, UN agencies, donors and academic institutions.  This group has been asked to identify areas for revision at the start of the process and comment on drafts emerging from the Regional Working Groups.

 

Email and Web based consultation group: Other field practitioners and experts to comment and review the original handbook, and the draft of the revision.

 

Additionally, the Focal Points for the cross-cutting issues (protection, HIV-AIDS, children, disabled, elderly, women and the environment) are also developing reference groups which in turn will review the revised text.

 

The project sent out over 2000 flyers (English, French and Spanish versions) to agencies around the world announcing the revision and also posted revision information on frequently visited websites such as ReleifWeb and AlertNet.

 

 

 

 

4.2      Support and facilitate efforts world-wide to produce local-language publications of the handbook following the successful initiatives of Phase II.

Going forward, the Sphere project is suggesting that agencies wait for the revised edition of the handbook before undertaking translations. However, a group of agencies working in Peru have printed their own edition of the Spanish handbook (at a reduced cost) so as to be able to provide copies country-wide. 1000 copies have been printed so far, and due to high demand, it is expected that more will be printed.

Also, groups of agencies working in Pakistan and Afghanistan are working to translate the Sphere handbook into Dari, Farsi and Pashto.

Annex 3 shows many of the different language productions of the Sphere handbook to date.

 

4.3      Undertake specific language productions if not produced during Phase II of Arabic, Chinese and/or KiSwahili.

The Arabic edition of the handbook is available and orders for copies are strong. The Iranian Red Crescent used the handbook in its recent preparedness exercise.

 

There have been many delays with the Swahili edition but we are hoping to have a published edition by early 2003.

 

4.4      Liaise with, and encourage other humanitarian consortia who are consolidating and producing Minimum Standards on other sectors and promote the Sphere process of broad-based collaboration and sector expertise and consensus.

The project regularly responds to enquires from various agencies and groups of agencies working on developing standards or following a broadly consultative process. It is likely that the Sphere secretariat will make suggestions to a group (led by the IFRC) on developing a Code of Practice for HIV/AIDS work.

 

4.5      Minimum Standards and key indicators regarding food security in disasters and calamity could be incorporated into future editions of the handbook if they have been developed through a broad, collaborative, evidence-based process.

 

A Focal Point for Food Security is working with the Food Aid and Nutrition Focal Points. Their consultations and analysis have led them to develop an integrated chapter called Food Security and Nutrition for the second edition of the handbook.

 

4.6      Handbook general sale

Handbook sales continue strong, though we anticipate a slowing of orders as word of the revision gets around.

 

5. Evaluation

The evaluation did not formally begin until September 2003 but an initial meeting of the Advisory Group took place in July 2002. Chaired by Mr. Niels Dabelstein of DANIDA, the meeting addressed aspects of the evaluation such as transparancy versus confidentiality, the case study country locations and the role of the Advisory Group. This group will meet at least two more times over the course of the evaluation to provide guidance on various issues such as methodology, analysis of frameworks and to review progress reports.

 

6. Project management, staffing and funding

 

Management Committee

During this period, the Sphere Management Committee met in May and September 2002.

The MC agencies have agreed to an IFRC-sponsored hosting agreement that outlines liability for the project. Additionally, the MC agreed to an IFRC cost-recovery scheme based on a percentage of project expenditures. Noting that the IFRC hosted the project for five years without any cost recovery, the other members of the Management Committee agreed this was reasonable.

 

Staffing

The two part-time consultants working with the pilot agencies for the past two years closed their work with the writing of the Institutionalising Sphere report.

In order to maximise efficiencies, we have collapsed the full-time post in London and the part-time post in Geneva into a full-time Senior Assistant post based in Geneva.

 

Funding

The project is basically on target with income and expenses (actual and committed) but the Year 3 budget is approximately $100,000 higher because of the unanticipated costs of the IFRC hosting fee, the costs of translations and maintaining the piloting and institutionalising work.

 

The next interim report will cover 1st November 2002 – 30th April 2003 and will be available in early June 2003.

 

END